Last night, during the City Council, we were required to vote Rejection of two-storey building in a very important building on the plain of S. Joseph. Below, the
ns. explanation of vote, which explains the reasons that led us to not vote.
The vote on this instance of rejection is just another step in a path debatable undertaken by the Government on the issue of the Plain of S. Joseph.
On the one hand we have the certainty (see also the minutes of the CC of July 30, 2009) that the Councillor Marcia, hounded by ns. group, did not give due importance to our request to verify compliance to the possible presence of "parties aggrieved" with regard to the deletion of paragraph 8 of Article 11 NTA, stating that there were not (and instead there were all right ...) . On the other hand is nothing new (in the marketplace, and of our PGT tonight. Group is a clear testimony) that the Board is accustomed to doing and undoing itself, undermines the role of the Board municipal pure CA-day administration. From this point of view the decision of the TAR is clear: the Administration, taking forward the issue of dispute with the owners of lots in the plane of S. Joseph by the manager of the sector, has effectively bypassed the city council. To think that the intention was to do quickly is plausible, but the suspicion is that you do not want to disclose much about the issue.
Now back to the Administration by the Council to call for the rejection of the plan since the TAR has argued that the matter fell within the jurisdiction of the City Council.
part of the Group of Democratic Party we have repeatedly called for (even with no interpellations and motions) the protection of the territory by the wild overbuilding Lega implemented by government in the last 15 years, as we have always hoped that the Plains of San Joseph remained green zone, being the last piece of land remained unharmed in the area and being in a critical area that is suffering under the effects of environmental impacts and traffic. We can not emphasize strongly the absurd position of weakness which has got the authority to which it formally clarify once and for all the facts, because the presence of potential beneficiaries of the error legislation from 2007 could make the starting point of rejecting a new set of appeals, not to mention the potential shortfalls / fees, and costs of the legal practices that the community is already supporting. The change of direction, advocated by the Administration itself on the urbanization of city land, it is only right and proper but should be part of a clear and transparent system of governance: how far implemented in the curriculum of the PGT does not leave much hope, Unless a total rethinking of the operational modes of an administration crushed by the heaviness of his past, from the low parts in non-crispness of key functions and the degradation of the function of the Council Hall and a mere functions of the Boards approval to-day administration.
From this point of view, since we are required to vote for which we are not in a position to make objective assessments, the group of the Democratic Party, a sign of disapproval of the overall modus operandi of the Administration will not participate in the vote .
0 comments:
Post a Comment